Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago Railroad v. Cauble
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover the value of a cow alleged to have been killed by the locomotive and cars of the appellant.
The only question presented for our decision is, whether *278the court below possessed jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action and of the appellant.
It appears of record, that George H. Chapman, receiver of the Louisville, New Albany, and Chicago Railroad Company, appointed by the Circuit Court of the United States, for the district of Indiana, entered a special appearance in the justice’s court, from which this cause was appealed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. WhiteneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- New Albany & Salem Railroad v. TiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- President of the Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wall v. PlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Ryan v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Heath v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Henry v. EpsteinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.