Newsome v. Up-To-Date Laundry, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUARLES, District Judge.
Pending are defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. For the following reasons, class certification will be granted as to the liability phase of plaintiffs’ pattern or practice claims, and conditionally granted as to the remedial phase of the trial pending Up-To-Date Laundry’s (“UTD”) completion of class-based discovery. UTD’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.
I. Background
UTD is a commercial laundry that cleans hospital linens. Work conditions at UTD, especially in the soil room where…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Quinton Brown v. Nucor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Robinson v. Fountainhead Title Group Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Employees Committed for Justice v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Koch v. HicksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Bulmash v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.