Legal Opinion

Bulmash v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 8, 2009No. Civil No. JFM 07-2075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Helane Bulmash (“Bulmash”) has brought suit against Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) alleging that Travelers failed to tender payment of statutory interest on Personal Injury Protection claims that were paid late by Travelers. Now pending is Bulmash’s motion for class certification, opposed by Travelers. The issues have been fully briefed and no oral hearing is necessary. The motion for class certification will be granted.

I

Bulmash seeks to certify the following class:

All of Travelers’ Maryland insureds who, during the period August…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Deiter v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. Leo A. Lukenas and Geraldine R. Lukenas, Etc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Bryce's Mountain Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuei-I Wu v. Mamsi Life & Health InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Peter G. Milne, P.C., Peter G. Milne, Individually, and Healy, Milne & Associates, P.C. v. Val Ryan and Joy Ryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  3. Spine Care Delaware, LLC v. United States Automobile AssociationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API