Legal Opinion

Ex Parte T.D.M., 1091645 (Ala. 10-28-2011)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 28, 2011No. 1091645PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

T.D.M. was convicted of one count of sexual abuse in the first degree and one count of sodomy in the first degree. The record shows that at the end of T.D.M.’s trial on August 16, 2007, the jury first returned verdicts of guilty on the sexual-abuse charge and not guilty on the sodomy charge. The jury was then discharged, and the jurors left the courtroom. After a short time, during which proceedings continued in the courtroom, the circuit clerk entered to inform the judge that the not-guilty verdict had been entered as a result of a clerical error. The trial court then recalled and polled the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Brister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Daniels v. BloomquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Masters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teresa Wagner v. Carolyn JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Lahaina Fashions, Inc. v. Bank of HawaiiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Lahaina Fashions, Inc. v. Bank of Hawai‘i.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. G.V.C. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. Pate v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API