Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Liddicoat

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1939No. Civ. No. 10868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is a motion, presented under the authority of section 3 oí rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, to .dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment on the grounds that the appeal was taken for delay only and that the questions upon which the *76decision of the case rests are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument.

It has been repeatedly held, however, that such a motion should not be granted where it appears, after an examination of the opening brief and the papers filed in support of the motion, that the appeal cannot be decided without examining the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Barr v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Ross v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doran v. MaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API