Legal Opinion

County of Riverside v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1938No. Civ. No. 2174PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment on the ground that the appeal is frivolous, is taken for delay only, and that the' questions presented are so unsubstantial as to need no further argument.

In Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co., 11 Cal. App. (2d) 357, 358 [53 Pac. (2d) 1038], this court said:

“We have frequently held that such a motion should not be granted where it appears, after examination of the opening brief and the papers filed in support of the motion, that the case cannot be decided without examining the entire record. (Brown v. Gow, 126 Cal. App. 113 [14 Pac.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Barr v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Ross v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Day v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API