Everest Development, Ltd. v. City of Roseville
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
In this action under the Government Data Practices Act, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to compel production of documents prepared to settle a lawsuit between the City of Roseville and a prospective developer. We reverse.
FACTS
In 1986, the Centre Pointe Investment Company (CPIC) and Business Park Limited Partnership entered a development agreement with the City of Roseville (the city) to develop a 60-acre tract of land known as the Centre Pointe Business Park. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, CPIC invested millions of dollars…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Westrom v. Minnesota Department of Labor & IndustryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Op. Atty. Gen. 852 (Cr. Ref. 523a-17, 523a-27), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2000
- Op. Atty. Gen. 852 (Cr. Ref. 523a-17, 523a-27), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2000