Star Tribune v. Minnesota Twins Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s order denying their motions to intervene, to modify the court’s protective order, and to have access to unfiled discovery and sealed pleadings. Appellants, all members of print and electronic media, argue that the district court (1) abused its discretion in entering the protective order and (2) erred by refusing to provide the media with access to the unfiled discovery and sealed pleadings and by denying the media’s motion to intervene. Because we conclude that the district court acted within its discretion and correctly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- In Re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, (Esm-1). Appeal of News and Sun-Sentinel Co. And John EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In re Glaxosmithkline plcCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Grant County Social Services, Natasha Kaiser, OBO A.C.R., Ward of the Commissioner of the State of MN v. S. J. M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015