Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Amoroso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 20, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*941Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 2, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that Laraine T. Carmichael, Ltd. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.
In November 1998, claimant began working as a medical transcriptionist for Laraine T. Carmichael, Ltd. (hereinafter Carmichael), a business that provides transcription services to physicians. She performed such services at home on a part-time basis while she held a full-time position as a credit counselor. After her job as a credit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Medical Transcription Plus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of StuckelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of ZelenkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of GuidicipietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Matter of Ingle (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015