Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Guidicipietro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 1, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that Hariton & D’Angelo, LLP was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

Hariton & D’Angelo, LLP is a law firm formed specifically for pursuing litigation claims against a diet pill manufacturer whose product posed a risk of heart valve damage to its users. The manufacturer ultimately established a nationwide class action settlement fund for those users adversely affected by the diet pills. To that end, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BooneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of AmorosoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of SalamatianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Matter of Kristensen (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. In re MackeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re MackeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re the Claim of Jean-PierreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API