Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. The court stated the case as follows: In May, 1881, the'Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining and Milling Company was incorporated under the laws of Colorado, with an authorized capital of one million dollars, for the purpose of carrying on a general mining and milling business in that State.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. The court stated the case as follows: In May, 1881, the'Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining and Milling Company was incorporated under the laws of Colorado, with an authorized capital of one million dollars, for the purpose of carrying on a general mining and milling business in that State. Its principal office is in Alpine, Colorado, and since July 1, 1881. it has had, and still has, an office in the city of Philadelphia, “ for the use of its officers, stockholders, agents, and employes.” On the 31st of October, 1881, the Auditor…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field
The only questions passed upon bv the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which can be considered by us, are those which arise upon its ruling against the contention of the plaintiff in error that the statute of the Commonwealth is in.conflict with clauses of the Federal Constitution. Its ruling upon the conformity of the statute with the constitution of the Commonwealth does not come under our jurisdiction.. The clauses of the Federal Constitution, -with which it was urged in the state Supreme Court that the statute conflicts, are the one vesting in Congress the power-to regulateuforeign and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.