Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Home Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields

Complainants bring this bill to recover $404, loss and damage caused by fire to property covered by a policy issued to them by the defendant. Issuance of the policy, loss by fire to the extent claimed, and that proper notice was given and proof furnished, are conceded.

The controversy is whether, under a provision in the policy that the company should not be held for any loss occurring while any part of the premium was due and unpaid, the policy was suspended by the failure of the complainants to pay a certain installment of a premium note made by them, and past due when the property was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Pitt v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Alexander v. Continental Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Phenix Ins. v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Dale v. Continental InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. National Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Berry v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  3. Davis v. Home Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. American Insurance Company v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Home Ins. Co. v. McFarlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API