Legal Opinion

Moline v. Kotch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1942No. 33,286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining separate demurrers to her complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The pleading here attacked has all the attributes of a blunderbuss, which has been defined as a firearm “intended to shoot objects at close quarters, without exact aim.” However, from a study of it, we have been able to gather these facts: The relationship of plaintiff’s intestate and Meri, his widow, to defendant John A. Kotch, Jr. is that of parents and son, and to defendant Bernice Kotch, that of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brajovich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Hamilton v. Village of DetroitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Childs v. RueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Portner v. WilfahrtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Gamble v. MosloskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peters v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. In Re Trusteeship Created by FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Klick v. FearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API