Portner v. Wilfahrt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., overruling their separate demurrers to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
On May 21, 1885, Johann Portner, now deceased (his wife, Maria Portner, joining him in the deed), conveyed his farm to his son Andrew Portner, one of the defendants, and in consideration therefor received from the latter a bond, payable to said Johann Portner and Maria Portner, “or their assigns, or each of them,” to secure maintenance for life for each, with a further provision that certain cash payments should be made to other children. This bond provided, among other things, for the payment of a certain *74sum of money to each obligee, and the conditions thereof were made a specific lien on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Branch v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Easton v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Horton v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Bannitz v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Malicki v. MalickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Marin v. CalmensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Moline v. KotchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.