Legal Opinion

Childs v. Rue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1901No. Nos. 12,699—(74)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in the district court for Sibley county to have a certain warranty deed declared a mortgage and to foreclose the same-From an order, Cadwell, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

James L. Maxson and wife, during their lifetime, executed and delivered to their son-in-law, Samuel Chase, a warranty deed to certain premises, the consideration of which was in the following language:

“The said parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar, and other good and valuable considerations to them in hand paid by the party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted * * * Said party of the second part, for himself, his heirs and assigns, hereby agrees, in consideration of this conveyance to him, to board the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doescher v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Johnson v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Phillips v. GannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gamble v. MosloskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Stephens v. DalyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API