Legal Opinion

Greer v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 20, 1972No. 1 CA-IC 631PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

The petitioner urges that she suffers pain which is causally related to her industrial injury and which prevents her from engaging in gainful employment.

Prior to 30 June 1969 the petitioner was a physically active woman. She was employed as a citrus packer, an occupation requiring strength and physical activity. In the course of her employment on 30 June 1969 she fell and was injured. She has not worked since that date.

She was treated initially by Wayne H. Nielson, D.C. On or about 13 October 1969 she came under the care of Joseph G. Ramsey, D.C., who continued to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Midland-Ross Corporation v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Chrysler Corporation v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. White v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mahan v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Smith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Greer v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API