Legal Opinion

Mork Et Ux. v. Caslov

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1937No. Appeal, 208PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

On August 16, 1933, shortly after eight o’clock in the evening, the plaintiff, Blanche Mork, was injured while riding in an automobile, which was owned and driven at the time by her sister, Mrs. Steelnack. It appears that earlier in the evening plaintiff and her sister had visited an attorney to discuss a replevin suit in which plaintiff was involved. At the time of the accident she was being driven by the sister to the office of a bondsman, so that she might make arrangements for a replevin bond. She was riding upon the rear seat of the car, while a Mr. Lofgren…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Eckert v. Merchants Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Matthews v. DerencinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Kocher v. Creston Transfer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. Keller Et Ux. v. Keystone Furniture Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Harris v. E. Oostdyk Motor Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API