People v. Larkin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J), entered on or about February 9, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
As the People concede, certain points were incorrectly assessed, and defendant’s presumptive risk level should thus be level two. Nevertheless, the record supports the conclusion that *593an upward departure to level three is warranted. The hearing court denied, as unnecessary, the People’s request for an upward departure. Accordingly, we are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MiddletonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009