People v. Middleton
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.
Defendant’s constitutional arguments are unpreserved. The record supports the determination of the courts below that defendant is a level three sex offender.
Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. TeagleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. DuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. WollekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.