Legal Opinion
People v. Middleton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), dated December 5, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Upon the defendant’s appeal from a prior risk assessment determination, this Court remitted the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new hearing and determination…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. ForneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. TeagleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. DuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. WollekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.