Legal Opinion
People v. Hoffman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 2009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated April 21, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant was designated a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C after a hearing. We affirm the designation but for reasons other than those set forth by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. McCollumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. TeagleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. DuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ParillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.