Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Libby

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 26, 2006No. Misc. 06-123 to 06-126, 06-128, 06-169PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WALTON, District Judge.

On February 27, 2006, this Court issued an order permitting the defendant to serve subpoenas duces tecum on news reporters and news organizations with production dates well in advance of the scheduled trial date as authorized by Federal Rule of Criminal Produce 17(c)(1). February 27, 2006 Order. Consistent with this Order, the defendant served Rule 17(c) subpoenas on a number of news reporters and news organizations. Currently before the Court are motions to quash from NBC News, Andrea Mitchell, Time Inc., 1 Matthew Cooper, The New York Times, and…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. LibbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Milstead v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Milstead v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. United States v. LibbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. United States v. Binh Tang VoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API