Legal Opinion
United States v. Libby
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 2, 2006No. Criminal 05-394(RBW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
On October 26, 2006, this Court heard extensive testimony and argument on the defendant’s motion to admit the expert testimony of Dr. Robert A. Bjork. 1 Specifically, the defendant opines that he should be permitted to introduce the testimony of Dr. Bjork “regarding [what he characterizes as] the widely-accepted findings from the science of memory.” Def.’s Mot. at 1. Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with this motion, the exhibits, and the testimony presented during the hearing on the motion, the Court must conclude…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Halcomb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. LibbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Powell v. ToshDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Heller v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.