Legal Opinion

Lee v. Price

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1919No. 2270PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for writ of prohibition by Arthur J. Lée against Price, a municipal corporation and others.

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

Arthur J. Lee, a resident and taxpayer of Price, a city of the third class, commenced this action in this court to have defendants prohibited from selling and disposing of certain municipal bonds, the issue and sale of which had previously been authorized by the qualified electors of said Price at a special election duly called and regularly held £ifor the purpose of raising money for the purpose of supplying Price, Carbon county, Utah, with water, and to that end to improve the works for supplying said water, which said works are owned and controlled by-said Price.” The plaintiff alleges…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Koehler & Lange v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cudihee v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re Senate File 31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Worman v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mundell v. SwedlundIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Coulter v. Dodge, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Coulter v. Dodge, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API