People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Loomis
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Kent; Wolcott, J. Quo ivarranto proceedings by the people of the State of Michigan, on the relation of the board of supervisors of Kent county, to inquire into the right of Robert B. Loomis, William P. Wolf, and Sylvester Hicks to hold the office of board of county auditors of said county. There was a judgment for respondents, and relator assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
At its T903 session the legislature passed a law providing for the appointment by the governor of three persons, to constitute a provisional board of county auditors for the county of Kent; their successors to be elected at the general election in the year 1904. On June 15, 1903, such appointments were made, and the respondents have since assumed to hold such office. This proceeding is in the nature of a quo warranto, instituted by one De Grraaf, by authority of the board of supervisors of the county, under leave granted by the circuit court, to inquire into respondents’ right to hold such…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Koehler & Lange v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Collier v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McAdams v. HenleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Browne v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In re Ming for a Writ of Habeas CorpusNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Twichel v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Attorney General ex rel. Burbank v. StrykerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.