Walker v. Lanning
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal by intervener from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered May 10, 1912, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
— This is an appeal by the intervener, Bratnober Lumber Company, from a judgment denying a lien upon certain property belonging to the defendants Pierano, for the value of materials delivered at the request of the defendant Lanning, their contractor. Materials for the construction of the building on the property were delivered by the lumber company between May 6, 1911, and September 30, 1911. Eor the materials delivered between May 6th to and including June 6th, the lien was allowed. But for the material delivered between June 7th and September 30th, the lien was refused, on the ground that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Atkinson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Santa Cruz Water Co. v. KronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hallin v. TrentWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Yelle v. KramerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Fain v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Columbia River Door Co. v. ToddOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. PaulWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.