Legal Opinion

Cannon v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 2, 1997No. CACR 96-1018PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry Crabtree, Judge.

Appellant Karsten Cannon appeals his conviction of delivery of a controlled substance for which he was sentenced to 240 months’ incarceration. On appeal, appellant argues that the judgment should be reversed because he was forced to appear in court in prison garb, because the trial court admitted a lab report in violation of the controlling statute, and because the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.

We affirm the judgment on the basis that appellant’s abstract is flagrantly deficient. Appellant did not abstract the judgment and commitment order, the jury’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sisk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Timmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. DixCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Aka v. Jefferson Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API