Sisk v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.
This appeal arose from a revocation of probation and resulting prison sentence in Crawford County. Jacob Sisk argues that (1) the trial court erred in sentencing him pursuant to revocation of an illegal sentence; (2) the trial court erred in revoking his probation because there was insufficient evidence to revoke his probation; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to furnish him with a written statement of the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking his probation. We affirm.
On November 13, 2000, the State charged appellant with possession of methamphetamine…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Bangs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Culpepper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Box v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Billings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vangilder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Dooly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Jamie Passmore v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.