Legal Opinion

Sisk v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 2003No. CA CR 02-649PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

This appeal arose from a revocation of probation and resulting prison sentence in Crawford County. Jacob Sisk argues that (1) the trial court erred in sentencing him pursuant to revocation of an illegal sentence; (2) the trial court erred in revoking his probation because there was insufficient evidence to revoke his probation; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to furnish him with a written statement of the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking his probation. We affirm.

On November 13, 2000, the State charged appellant with possession of methamphetamine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Bangs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Culpepper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Box v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Billings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vangilder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Dooly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Jamie Passmore v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API