Barker v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF LARIMER
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lee
In this original proceeding, a rule was issued to the respondent district court to show cause why relief prohibiting further proceedings in a statutory nuisance abatement case should not be granted. We now make the rule absolute.
On August 13, 1979, the district attorney of Larimer County filed a complaint in the district court to abate a class 1 public nuisance pursuant to section 16-13-301, et seq., C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8), on the ground that the building involved was being used as a “public or private place of prostitution.” Section 16-13-303(l)(a), C.R.S. 1973.
The caption of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hidden Lake Development Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Gaskins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Ivanhoe Grand Lodge A.F. & A.M. v. Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Ancient Free & Accepted MasonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- People v. CorySupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Jenkins v. Estate of ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Adams v. Neoplan U.S.A. Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- County Memorial Hospital v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Edmond v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.