Legal Opinion
Adams v. Neoplan U.S.A. Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 19, 1993No. 92CA1595PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
In this workers’ compensation case, claimant, Karen Adams, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel reversing that part of the order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) assessing attorney fees and costs for a frivolous and groundless defense against the attorney for respondents, Neoplan U.S.A. Corporation and Allianz Insurance Company. We set aside the Panel’s order and remand with directions to reinstate the order of the ALJ.
After the hearing to determine compensa-bility, the ALJ concluded that attorney fees and costs could be awarded under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martinez v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Miller v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Maul v. ShawColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- American Respiratory Care Services v. Manager of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Little v. FellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colorado Motor Vehicle Dealer Licensing Board v. Northglenn Dodge, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- E & a Associates v. First National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Anglum v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998