Legal Opinion
Calabretta Ex Rel. Calabretta v. National Airlines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 12, 1981No. 75 C 1709PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAMWELL, District Judge.
Defendants Boeing Airlines Co. (“Boeing”) and National Airlines, Inc. (“National”) have moved for summary judgment in this action for personal injuries. 1 Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a district court to grant summary judgment when an action presents no genuine issues of material fact and when the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Adickes v. S. H. Kress and Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); SEC v. Research Automation Corp., 585 F.2d 31, 33 (2d Cir. 1978).
Prior to applying the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maiden v. BiehlDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Tinder v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Carlos v. MTL, INC.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- Marshall v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Ritz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983