Legal Opinion
Trump Taj Mahal Associates v. Hotel Services, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 9, 1998No. CIV. 96-3468 JHRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KUGLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion by Brian C. Darreff, Esquire, attorney for Defendant Roboserve (Canada) Ltd. (“Robo-serve”), for an order quashing service of process on the grounds of Plaintiffs failure to comply with the procedures set forth in the Hague Convention. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
Background
On July 13, 1998 Plaintiff Trump Taj Ma-hal Associates (the “Taj”) filed an amended *175complaint naming as defendants Roboserve, Hotel Services, Ltd., fik/a Robobar, Ltd. and Citylink Group, Ltd. See Exhibit…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dimensional Communications, Inc. v. Oz Optics Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Cook ex rel. Maya's Meals v. ToidzeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Beloit Walmsley Ltd. (In Re Harnischfeger Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- ADAM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. DONGGUAN WELL SHIN ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Bednarsky v. Rose Wreath Tree, No. Cv 01 0379777 S (Jul. 27, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.