Legal Opinion
Horvath v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1942No. 2221PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Riner, Chief Justice.
The question to be disposed of by our decision in this litigation is whether there shall be upheld an order of the district court of Crook County granting a new trial in an action upon an alleged contract which it is claimed was made in connection with a Workmen’s Compensation proceeding. The appellate procedure is that permissible under one of the provisions of the direct appeal law of this state, viz., Section 89-4910, W. R. S. 1931.
The plaintiff and appellant, Louis Horvath, will be usually subsequently referred to herein as the “plaintiff”, the “employee” or by his…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Arentz v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Workmen's Compensation Board v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hursh Agency, Inc. v. Wigwam Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Degen v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.