Legal Opinion

Workmen's Compensation Board v. Abbott

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 18, 1925PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Sustaining motion for appeal and reversing the judgment.

The appellee, L. Y. Abbott, was engaged in the business of an architect, engineer and builder in the city of Lousville and was subject to the provisions of our statute known as the “Workmen’s Compensation Act” (hereafter referred to as “the act.”) He had in his employ the appellee, Thomas J. McGuire, who was 28 years old and otherwise sui juris. Both Abbott and McGuire had accepted the provisions of the act, and the latter sustained an injury covered by it. He made application to the compensation board…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Greene v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Kentucky State Racing Commission v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  2. Kentucky Harlan Coal Co. v. HolmesKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Petition of Florida State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  4. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API