Legal Opinion

Seligman v. Seligman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1927No. Docket No. 3284PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff had judgment in an action to quiet title to certain tracts of land lying and being in the county of Tulare; also to certain city lots in the town of Kingsburg, in the county of Fresno; and to an undivided one-half interest in a certain ten-acre tract in Springfield Colony, in the county of Fresno. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

The lands involved are described as the west half of the southwest quarter of section 8 in township 17 south of range twenty-three east, M. D. B. & M.; the northwest quarter of section 32, in township 17 south, range twenty-six east, M. D. B. & M.;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Estate of GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Thompson v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In Re State of CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. De La Luz Tovar Cozzi v. CozziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Heslip v. HeslipIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Gilmore v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Cline v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API