Legal Opinion
Swanson v. Cross Lake Land Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 15, 1934No. 29,928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Certiorari to the district court to review an order vacating an order granting relator an extension of time to redeem from a mortgage foreclosure sale under the provisions of L. 1933, c. 339.
Respondent moves to dismiss because a formal judgment of dismissal had been entered on the order when the writ of certiorari was applied for, and hence the exclusive remedy was by appeal from the judgment; also, the petition for the writ was defective in not disclosing the judgment. The rule of Neumann v. Edwards, 146 Minn. 179, 178 N. W. 589, is invoked. We think the rule there stated is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yorke v. YorkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Berthold v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Brown v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Beach v. BeachSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
- Phelps v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Petters and Co. v. Jefferson County BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Daw v. DawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- The Frissell Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Rivkin v. NilesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935