Legal Opinion
The Frissell Co. v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1939No. 31,799PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Certiorari to review an order made on respondent’s motion and dismissing, for supposed want of jurisdiction, an application by relators for an extension of time to redeem from a mortgage foreclosure sale.
The mortgage in question was foreclosed in 1934, and the period for redemption was to expire April 2, 1935. There were two extensions, under L. 1935, c. 47, and L. 1937, c. 21 (3 Mason Minn. St. 1938 Supp. § 9633-1, et seq.). The period for redemption allowed by the latest extension was to expire March 1, 1938.
February 24, 1938, relators filed their petition for a third extension. That…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Petters and Co. v. Jefferson County BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Swanson v. Cross Lake Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Santee v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Steensland v. Western and Southern Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Shumaker v. HooverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Thielman v. Lincoln County Highway CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Shumaker v. HooverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939