Legal Opinion
Kimmel v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1941No. 28033PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
By this action, plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of-ordinance No. C6860 of the city of Spokane, entitled:
“An ordinance relating to traffic and regulating the use of public streets and highways of the City of Spokane; providing for the installation, regulation and control of the use of parking meters; requiring the deposit of coins for the use of parking meters and parking meter zones; defining parking meter zones; providing for the disposition of revenues derived from parking meters; providing for the enforcement thereof; defining offenses and providing penalties; and declaring an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Harkow v. McCarthySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Hendricks v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Winkenwerder v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Walker v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Foster's, Inc. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.