Fabian v. Alphonzo E. Bell Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of real property and to recover the value of improvements placed thereon, for the reason that the contract had been induced through (1) fraud, (2) misrepresentation, (3) nondisclosure of material facts, (4) mistake, and (5) failure of consideration, plaintiffs appeal.
For the purpose of this appeal we may assume the following facts:
On or about July 9, 1935, plaintiffs purchased from defendants a parcel of real property located in the county of Los Angeles. At…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Campbell v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Gamble v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beckett v. Kaynar Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Kimberlin v. Los Angeles City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gedstad v. EllichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Cole v. CalawayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.