Legal Opinion
Cole v. Calaway
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1956No. Civ. 4977PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In these two actions, consolidated for trial and on appeal, plaintiffs and respondents Douglas Arthur Cole and John Meacoek, individually and as representatives of Underwriters at Lloyd’s London subscribing certificates LC-17341, LC-20852 and LC-22530 respectively, brought this action in declaratory relief against defendant and appellant A. A. Calaway, a medical doctor (hereinafter referred to as defendant) et al. to declare the rights and duties of the respective parties under said certificates and to declare them null and void under certain claimed breaches of warranty by defendant in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- J. Frank & Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Williamson & Vollmer Engineering, Inc. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Civil Service Employees Insurance v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Allstate Insurance v. McCurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.