Legal Opinion

Gorman Et Ux v. Jones Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Con'Nell, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment in which plaintiffs seek a determination of their rights under a written right-of-way agreement. Plaintiffs also pray for a judgment allowing them attorney’s fees in accordance with the terms of that agreement. Defendants appeal from a decree interpreting the agreement in accordance with plaintiffs’ prayer. Plaintiffs cross-appeal from that part of the decree denying plaintiffs an award’of attorney’s fees.

On March 26, 1954 plaintiffs, and defendants entered into an agreement entitled “Right-of Way Agreement” which granted a non-exclusive easement of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Casey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lewis v. Continental Causalty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. SELLGREN ET UX v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Williams v. CorbettOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Baker v. DeterOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pearson v. SigmundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Long v. SendelbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API