Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Sigmund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1972PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a suit for an injunction against further cutting and removal of timber under a contract for the sale of such timber. Plaintiffs’ complaint also demanded payment of $10,000 allegedly due under that contract. After the issuance of a preliminary injunc tion, defendants filed a counterclaim for damages, including attorney fees, for the issuance of a wrongful injunction and for breach of contract, as well as damages for wrongfully representing that there was “suitable ingress and egress for the purposes of removing timber * * * ”

The trial court denied relief to both parties, but held that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Olds v. CaryOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kulm v. Coast-To-Coast Stores Central Organization, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gas-Ice Corporation v. NewbernOregon Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Allan Block Corp. v. County Materials Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Hardwick v. Dravo Equipment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Devine v. CluffIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API