Legal Opinion

Williams v. Corbett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

A statute of this state confers upon the Wage and Hour Commission the authority to establish minimum wages and maximum hours for employed women. ORS 653.110, 653.125, 653.205 to 653.250, and 653.305. This statute was held constitutional in Stettler v. O'Hara, 69 Or 519, 139 P 743, aff. 243 US 629, 61 L ed 937, 37 S Ct 475. Undér date of November 13, 1947, the Commission promulgated an order, known as Public Housekeeping Order No. 14 (hereinafter referred to as Order No. 14), providing, among other things, for minimum wages and maximum hours for “experienced” women employed in “any public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stettler v. O'HaraOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Casey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Stettler v. O'HaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Turney v. J. H. Tillman Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Pederson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Godell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Garsjo v. Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Gorman Et Ux v. Jones Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API