Legal Opinion

Adair v. McAtee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1963PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Defendant McAtee bought furniture from plaintiffs, Adair. McAtee signed conditional sales contracts to secure his obligation to pay the purchase price. The contracts were not signed by either plaintiff. However, the furniture was delivered to McAtee and was used by him for the purposes intended. He made some payments as required by his contract and thereafter failed to make further payment.

This was an action by Adairs to recover the purchase price. McAtee, in defense,- claimed that there were no contracts because of the failure of either Adair to sign the contracts in question. The trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Casey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Kendall v. MohlerOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Purcell v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Allen v. National Video, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. First National Bank v. MaladyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. McMillan v. GoldenOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Swett v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API