Hornlein v. Bohlig
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendants for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien filed by plaintiff upon the property of defendants J. H. Bohlig and Lotta Bohlig.
Bohlig, the sole owner of a portion of the real property subjected to the lien, entered into a contract with Hladik & Thayer, architects, whereby said architects agreed to furnish all plans, specifications, architectural- work, and superintendence employed in the construction of a building to be erected, and which was erected, upon Bohlig’s land and partly upon land owned by Bohlig and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Lynch v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Gray v. HawesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Ford v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. Mountain View Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Gaastra v. Bishop's Lodge Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- San Mateo Planing Mill Co. v. Davenport Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Todd v. MeserveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Rivers v. PastroDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.