Legal Opinion
Todd v. Meserve
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1928No. Docket No. 6290PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
In this action plaintiff prays judgment against defendants in the sum of $20,302.28, and defendants Shirley E. Meserve, Robert B. Moran, and T. Howard Knight, individually and as trustees of an express trust, by way of cross-complaint pray judgment against plaintiff in the sum of $100,000.
About July 27, 1923, plaintiff, W. O. Todd, and defendants, Shirley E. Meserve, T. Howard Knight, and Robert B. Moran, as trustees of an express trust, entered into a written contract by the terms of which W. O. Todd agreed to drill an oil-well by the rotary method to be known as "…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Miller v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayter Trucking, Inc. v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Associated Lathing & Plastering Co. v. Louis C. Dunn, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Metzenbaum v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Covely v. C.A.B. Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Penn Security Life Insurance v. RisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.