Legal Opinion

ANDERSON INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1972No. 12832PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

Anderson appeals from a ruling of the trial court dismissing its complaint for failure to state a claim.

The plaintiff owns some land on the southeast corner of the intersection of North Temple and Third West Streets in Salt Lake City. Third West Street runs north and south on the west side and North Temple Street runs east and west on the north side of the Anderson property. For many years past North Temple Street has crossed some railroad tracks by means of a viaduct commencing on the west side of the intersection in question.

The State Road Commission decided to replace and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Sheffield v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Block v. Salt Lake Rapid Transit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Holt v. Utah State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bailey Service & Supply Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. ANDERSON INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API