Legal Opinion

Holt v. Utah State Road Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1973No. 13186PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages allegedly caused to their property on the northwest corner of the intersection of 100 South and 1100 East streets in St. George, by the construction of an underpass of highway 1-15, which lowered the grade, and impaired access to the property from 100 South Street. The court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs appeal.

There is no taking of property involved in this action. The law has long been established in this State that under those circumstances there can be no recovery from the State for damages because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. State Road Commission v. District Court, Fourth Judicial Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hjorth v. WhittenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Fairclough v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wheeler v. McPhersonUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Ogden City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Epting v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API