Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Kettner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 1, 1999No. 23156-5-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

984 P.2d 1047 (1999)

97 Wash.App. 370

Jim BUCHANAN and Fay Buchanan, husband and wife, Appellants,

v.

Irene KETTNER, an individual, Respondent.

No. 23156-5-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

August 13, 1999.

Publication Ordered October 1, 1999.

David C. Hammermaster, Sumner, for Respondent.

Dan Robert Young, Bjorklund & Young, Seattle, for Appellants.

David R. Koopmans, Walter Hartvig Olsen, Short, Cressman & Burgess, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae Manufactured Housing.

MORGAN, J.

Jim and Fay Buchanan appeal late fees imposed by the trial court. We affirm.

At the times material here, Buchanan[1]…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. MerryfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Wallace Real Estate Investment Inc. v. GrovesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Nylen v. Park Doral ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Watson v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. Sisters Administration Services, LLC v. A.T. Cross Company, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API