Watson v. Ingram
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Petitioner, a buyer under a residential real estate purchase and sale agreement, seeks to recover $15,000 in earnest money he paid into escrow. At issue is whether the earnest money agreement is enforceable as liquidated damages. More specifically, this case involves the test used to determine the enforceability of liquidated damages provisions in real estate purchase and sale agreements. The trial court enforced the agreement, finding it was a reasonable estimate of anticipated harm as of the date of contract formation. The Court of Appeals affirmed, likewise evaluating the provision as of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Wallace Real Estate Investment Inc. v. GrovesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Mead v. AntonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Ashley v. LanceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Wallace Real Estate Investment Inc. v. GrovesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- Michael Salewski, D.v.m., App. v. Pilchuck Veterinary Hospital, Inc., P.s., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.